I thought this is real text, not a screenshot and I got excited for a sec (using FF) :( Don't play with my heart, Adam!!

sorry..!

@argyleink "Version 2 will introduce more syntactic sugar and potentially fewer rules to memorize." 👀 this is great to hear!

I honestly hate seeing this in scss: &--header. Such a nightmare to search things when multiple devs are on a project. So glad CSS won’t support it.

Why the & is not present for the parent? We voted some time ago to keep the current syntax and not having the sass one... 😔

There was more voting…

😱😱 where

Ah ok & is just not mandatory as before. Pfew. Internet is safe.

I was about to write a "never nest in CSS" article but seems like there's no need. Good thing about 40% of this article is already pointing why u shouldn't.

CSS gibt es jetzt bald auch mit Nesting 😍

Nesting is the single biggest reason I use SASS

Are inline styles supported? For example, `<div style="&:hover { opacity: 0.75 }" />`